Creation on a Razor’s Edge
Nick Watts * August 16, 2026
Opening Remarks
After the death of my son, as I was investigating atheism to see if it offered a better explanation for “the problem of pain” than the biblical worldview, God used something in particular to help me with my doubt: the sun.
I remember thinking one hot, summer afternoon in 2013,
“What are the odds of the sun being the perfect distance from earth, made of the perfect stuff, giving off the perfect temperature? A little further away – life isn’t possible. A little closer – life isn’t possible.”
As astrophysicist, Brian Cox, commented (more from him soon),
“We are perfectly balanced within our solar system between fire and ice.”
That small step led to a deep dive into the fine-tuning of the universe. The possibility of it all “just happening,” I discovered, required more faith than believing in God – far more faith.
As I shared in my story, “Why Atheism Failed Me,” I had no interest in reading “internet atheists,” those posting half-baked philosophies on social media.For example, Dan Barker is president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation. In his book Losing Faith in Faith, Barker asserts:
I’m sure Dan’s a nice guy. But any intelligent human being can easily recognize how ridiculous Barker’s assertion is. His statement is so uneducated it’s laughable.
But the masses listen to irresponsible comments like this from “experts” and swallow it whole without doing themselves the favor of thinking for themselves.
Then there are comments like the following from the renowned physicist, Steven Hawking…
Make no mistake: every worldview is a faith worldview.
Since science is impotent to prove or disprove anything outside the natural/physical world, the data behind Hawking’s claim is not science, but philosophy. In making this claim, he has effectively moved from the arena of science to simply sharing his opinion. Everyone has a right to share their opinion. But Hawking’s claim is not science.
John Lennox is professor of mathematics at Oxford University on Hawking’s interpretation of science.
“I have no problem with Hawking’s science. It’s his interpretations of science with which I disagree.” Lennox continued, “Nonsense is still nonsense even when claimed by world-famous scientists.”
Sarah Salviander holds a Ph.D. in Astrophysics. She particularly enjoys research of Quasars, and Supermassive Black Holes. She isn’t at all afraid of pushing back against “militant atheism,” most likely because she was raised as a “militant atheist,” finally coming to faith in Christ because of science. She writes directly:
Praveen Sethupathy, a Christian and professor of physiological genomics and Chair of the Department of Biomedical Sciences at the Cornell University, rightly said,
This is why a friend of mine in graduate school wrote,…
NYT best-selling author, Eric Metaxas, stated,
Apologist, Andy Bannister, sums it up succinctly…
When all the dust settles, what follows is what one’s opinion on creation comes down to.
There is no conflict between science and faith. The conflict arises from one’s interpretation of science – which boils down to merely opinions.
Is the biblical worldview based on faith? Yes. Is it blind faith? Far from it.
Antony Flew was a professor of philosophy at the universities of Oxford, Aberdeen, Keele, and Reading in the United Kingdom, and at York University in Toronto, Canada, belonging to the analytical and evidentialist schools of thought.
Flew was the champion of 20th century atheism, held in high esteem by all holding to an atheistic worldview. But something happened. Flew couldn’t deny the order of the universe. And when Flew, after an honest investigation of the universe, converted to theism (belief in God) it rocked the atheistic world.
After my 2013 crisis of faith, I was introduced to Flew’s book, There Is a God. It may be the most honest and erudite story of one’s investigation into the existence of God I’ve ever read. Flew wrote,
A Theological Framework
Let’s take a trip back in time to the mid 1st Century AD in Athens, Greece, where we find Paul having a conversation with some very smart people.
The scene the Areopagus (Mars Hill) where the brilliant philosophers of the day would gather and discuss questions philosophers discuss. It was a closed club, with people having to be invited to sit in. When Paul, a brilliant theologian and philosopher, was in Athens, they were so impressed with his intelligence they invited him to join them for some discussion. Luke records the scene in Acts 17. Notice how Paul describes God to them:
“The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth…” (Acts 17:22-24)
In studying the New Testament, I’ve noticed that when witnessing his Christian faith to Jews, Paul primarily appealed to Old Testament prophecy. And when witnessing to non-Jews, he would often appeal to creation. I think this is significant. Why would Paul begin with creation? I think I know why. Our universe screams “design.” Or, as David wrote,
“The heavens declare the glory of God.” (Ps 19:1)
The Universe on a Razor’s Edge
Brian Cox (mentioned earlier) is a British professor of particle physics in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Manchester and the Royal Society Professor for Public Engagement in Science. I love listening to him teach. Cox is not a Christian, holding to a purely naturalistic worldview.
In an interview, he was asked what impresses him most about the universe. He replied,
“There are a lot of things about the universe that I find almost impossible to imagine—well, actually impossible to imagine. One thing is just the size and scale of it.”
He continued…
I once had the pleasure of having lunch with Michael Strauss. Strauss earned his Ph. D. in experimental particle physics from UCLA. In addition to teaching physics at OU, he currently is doing research on the ATLAS detector, one of the two multi-purpose particle detectors located on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN near Geneva, Switzerland. In his book ‘The Creator Revealed’, Dr. Strauss, writes,
Let’s take a close look at the cosmos and see what worldview offers the best explanation for its existence and design. In fact, the Bible actually offers this same invitation to who are open to investigating the biblical worldview.
Let’s “come and see” just four of these “parameter knobs”.
“Knob” No. 1 – The Expansion of the Universe
Note what the Bible says…
Humor me for a moment, allowing me to site the science behind the beginning of the universe. This data will give needed context to the expansion of the universe.
In 1915, Albert Einstein, arguably the most famous theoretical physicist of all time, published his theory of general relativity, which is still the best explanation of how gravity works. When Einstein looked at his equations that described gravity, he noticed that they implied the universe should be expanding. He realized that such an expansion also implied the universe probably had a beginning.
“In the 1920s, the Russian mathematician, Alexander Friedman, and the Belgium astronomer/priest, George Lemaître, were able to develop models based on Einstein’s theory. They predicted the universe was expanding. Of course, this meant that if you went backward in time, the universe would go back to a single origin before which it didn’t exist (singularity).
Astronomer, Edwin Hubble’s, discovery of the “Red Shift” in in 1929:
What is Redshift?
- Light waves from objects moving away from us get stretched out.
- Longer light waves look redder on the light spectrum.
- This stretching shows that a cosmic body is moving backward or away from the observer. (Fast-forward about 40 years.)
In 1965, Arno Penzias & Robert Wilson discovered the Cosmic Microwave Background – the leftover thermal radiation from what almost certainly was a “beginning” (no longer past-eternal/infinite regress). This “beginning” was later coined, pejoratively, by Fred Hoyle as the “Big Bang.” This discovery won Penzias & Wilson the Nobel Prize in Physics.
Of course, this presented an uncomfortable problem for scientists who did not hold to a biblical worldview and also knew for certain something can’t come from nothing i.e. Ex Nihilo.
Even the 18th century philosopher and skeptic, David Hume, asserted, “I never asserted so absurd a proposition as that anything might arise without a cause.”
So, the question was: “If our universe had a beginning – and something can’t come from nothing – what was the ‘beginner’? Of course, the Bible answers the question, “Whowas the Beginner?”
(Fast-forward another 40-ish years.)
In 2003, another group of three physicists—Arvind Borde, Alan Guth, and Alexander Vilenkin—published a paper confirming in scientific detail how our universe cannot be eternal in the past.
Vilenkin is the Leonard Jane Holmes Bernstein Professor of Evolutionary Science and Director of the Institute of Cosmology at Tufts University. A theoretical physicist who has been working in the field of cosmology for 25 years. Vilenkin wrote,
In my research, no contemporary scientist with any cosmological integrity challenges a universe without a beginning. What they debate is how it appeared, and why it began. Something can’t come from nothing. A beginning must have a beginner. A cause must arise from, what Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, called a First Cause, or what the Bible calls God.
Hopefully, you can now see the intertwined relationship between the discovery of the universe’s beginning and the logical conclusion leading to the expansion of the universe. In short, that the universe is rapidly expanding tells us, if we put the expansion “in reverse” we arrive at a point of beginning – what scientists call “the point of singularity.”
Back to Edwin Hubble and his discovery of the Red Shift – He found that distant galaxies move away from us faster when they are farther away, a concept known as Hubble’s Law.
Hubble’s Law (officially the Hubble–Lemaître law) states that galaxies move away from Earth at speeds proportional to their distance. Farther galaxies recede faster. Translation:
Our universe is flying outward at speeds that are incomprehensible to mankind. And the farther away, for instance, a distant galaxy is from our own galaxy, the faster it is racing away from us.
By the way, do you think you’re still right now? Not true. We think we’re stationary only because our motion is relative to the motion around us – Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity. (Think: pitching a ball back and forth inside a moving car or an airplane). Consider this…
- Our planet is spinning at a speed of 1000 mph. We’re orbiting the Sun at 66,000 mph. Our Milky Way Galaxy is spinning at a speed of 490,000 mph. But we’re not done: our galaxy is flying through the expansion of the universe at 1.3 million mph. So, you’re moving around the earth, the earth is moving around the sun, the sun is moving around the galaxy, and the galaxy is moving through the universe.
Now, let’s put those first few nanoseconds after the Big Bang under the microscope when, according to the Bible, God spoke the cosmos into existence. What does science affirm was taking place after, “And God said…”?
In his book, Infinite Minds: A Philosophical Cosmology, John Leslie, observes,
“Quantum laws were preventing electrons from spiraling into atomic nuclei. Electromagnetism was allowing stars to burn steadily for billions of years; it was enabling carbon synthesis in stars; it was ensuring that leptons do not replace quarks, which would have made atoms impossible; it was responsible for protons not decaying too fast or repelling each other too strongly, which would have made chemistry impossible.”
Astrophysicist, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, in his book, Astrophysics for People in a Hurry:
“As the universe continued to expand, it was diluting all concentrations of energy, and what remained of the unified forces split into the “electroweak” and the “strong nuclear” forces. Then the electroweak force split into the electromagnetic and the “weak nuclear” forces, laying bare the four distinct forces we have come to know and love (Gravity, Electromagnetism, Strong Nuclear Force, Weak Nuclear Force): with the weak force controlling radioactive decay, the strong force binding the atomic nucleus, the electromagnetic force binding molecules, and gravity binding bulk matter.”
Then Tyson writes something that left me speechless. After all this fine-tuning of cosmological constants and quantum mechanics had taken place –
“A trillionth of a second has passed since the beginning.”
Back to Michael Strauss: (interviewed by Lee Strobel in Strobel’s book, “Is God Real?”) – Strobel asked, “Can you give me a few examples of the fine-tuning?” Strauss replied,
“Sure. One parameter required for the universe to survive is the amount of matter in the universe. As the universe expands, all matter is attracted to other matter by gravity. If there were too much matter, then the universe would collapse on itself before stars and planets could form. If there were too little matter, then stars and planets could never coalesce.”
Straus continued…
VIDEO LINK
Listen to how Brian Cox describes the universe’s remarkable survival of that “point of singularity”. Watch the video clip here.
Get ready: during that “trillionth of a second” , the interplay of matter in the form of subatomic particles, and energy in the form of photons (massless vessels of light energy that are as much waves as they are particles) was incessant. Photons comprise light!
That means that “point of singularity” exploded with light.
Note what the Bible says…
Don’t miss this: the reason scientists call the origin of the universe “The Big Bang” is because it was some kind of explosion on a level beyond human comprehension. But how many explosions have you seen that create not chaos, but order. And not only order, but unimaginably fine-tuned order? Consider the following illustrations:
- A tornado is not going to blow through a junkyard and assemble a 747 aircraft.
- Try throwing Scrabble pieces onto the kitchen table. Are they ever going to randomly fall into place spelling out the Preamble to the Constitution?
- How about sitting down to a bowl of Alphabet Soup? (Remember that?) What if you sat down and the letters in your bowl said, “Good morning, (insert your name.) Don’t forget your appointment today at 2pm.”
- Everyone loves LEGO’s. If I took a box of individual LEGO pieces, placed a stick of dynamite inside the box, and exploded the box, do those LEGO’s, by chance, somehow perfectly assembled LEGO structure? (Today, those structures can comprise 1000’s of LEGO blocks.) Of course not. Natural explosions don’t result in order, but chaos. What if I took more LEGO’s and blew them up ten different times? Different results? No. How about a billion times? No. Every single time the result would be total chaos, with LEGO’s flinging into space.
- The most famous arguments for design is William Paley’s watchmaker argument. According to Paley, if we find a watch in a field no one would believe the watch created itself and appeared there by purely natural, unguided processes.
All of the above examples are examples of unguided, blind, random processes producing intelligence. It simply begs the question? What is the best explanation for producing intelligence? Clearly the answer is, “An intelligence”, or what we call “Intelligent Design.” The Bible calls this “Intelligence” God.
One might ask, “Is it possible that my Alphabet Soup might spell out an intelligent sentence on its own?” Fair question. Anything’s possible. But what is most probable? Most logical. Most reasonable and rational.
Further, scientists cited in this presentation make it crystal clear that the odds of blind, unguided processes producing intelligence is humanly incomprehensible. To hold to the purely naturalistic worldview requires mountainous faith. I just don’t have that much faith.
Our universe is unimaginably more complex than Alphabet Soup or LEGO’s. And with our universe, the explosion (Big Bang) exploded not into chaos, but into incomprehensible order, fine–tuned to a calibration beyond our ability to grasp. People who believe our universe happened by chance exercise far more faith than I have in the biblical God creating it all.
Stephen Myer received his Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge. In his book, “Return of the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries that Reveal the Mind Behind the Universe”, he explains,
Let’s pause and see if we can get some perspective for One Trillion.
If you counted back one trillion seconds, what year would it be? 29,679 BC!
British Physicist, Sir Robert Penrose takes these numbers and odds of our universe’s precision even further.
Try to image 10 to the 10th power to the 123rd power. We can’t. Let’s compare it to a number we still can’t comprehend but will give us somewhat of a perspective.
The odds of our universe exploding into its level of fine-tuning is so vast it falls within the realm of impossibility.
Does the fine-tuning of the universe prove God’s existence? No. Science is impotent to prove and disprove God’s existence. But, as Einstein observed, no honest, intelligent person can deny the overwhelming evidence for design over chance.
Einstein used the phrases “infinitely superior spirit” and “superior reasoning power” to describe the mind behind the universe. The Bible describes that “superior reasoning power” this way…
Parenthetically, when someone says, “I believe aliens created the universe,” I simply reply, “So you believe there is intelligence behind the creation?” This typically results in them immediately seeing the corner into which they’ve painted themselves.
Regardless of one’s worldview, the evidence for a carefully designed universe is overwhelming.
Paul Davies is a brilliant English physicist, professor at Arizona State University and director of BEYOND: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science. He is affiliated with the Institute for Quantum Studies in Chapman University in California. Davis, not a Christian, admits…
“Knob” No. 2 – Gravity
Gravity, along with electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces, is one of the Four Fundamental Laws of Physics. And it was Isaac Newton’s favorite mystery – a mystery he famously figured out scientifically. More on Newton in a moment.
The Bible is not a “science book” per se. That said, consider Job 26:7:
In this verse alone, we see three laws of nature:
- the expansion of the universe – “stretches the…skies”
- gravity – “hangs on nothing” (gravity can be measured by its evidence, but is itself invisible)
- the water cycle – “wraps up water in clouds” – Energy from the sun causes water on the surface to evaporate into water vapor – a gas. This invisible vapor rises into the atmosphere, where the air is colder, and condenses into clouds.
Let’s focus on gravity.
In 1687, Newton, published his Law of Universal Gravitation which states:
“The force of gravity acting between the earth and any other object is directly proportional to the mass of the earth, directly proportional to the mass of the object, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance which separates the centers of the earth and the object.”
Translation:
Every object in the universe is attracted to every other object in the universe by the force of gravity. The more mass an object has, the more other objects are attracted to it. This boggles the mind. For instance, not only does earth have to have a precise gravitational pull to hold the moon in its place. But, the moon must have its own precise gravitational pull to make the “marriage” between the earth and the moon work so that life can exist on planet earth.
The universal laws of gravitation have to be so precisely calibrated that if in the beginning there had been too much matter in the universe, then this gravitational attraction would have caused the universe to collapse back in on itself shortly after the big bang. If in the beginning there had been too little matter, then everything in the universe would have spread out too fast, and then there would not have been enough gravitational attractive force for matter to bunch together to form galaxies and solar systems.
Further, as we look at any planet or star in the vacuum of space, it behooves us to ask, “What is keeping it in place? Why is that celestial ball not crashing into us, or vice versa? What is it ‘hanging on? Can it be blind, unguided chance? Or is there a law of nature behind it? And if there’s a law of nature, what/who created that law?” That was Newton’s question. The Bible answers that question in the passage cited above.
Moving on: as an example of gravity’s fine-tuning being critical to permitting life, let’s use our nearest celestial neighbor – our moon.
This stunning photo of the moon against the background of earth gives the appearance there is not a great deal of distance between the two. But you would be surprised.
In way of trivia, if the earth were a basketball, then to scale, the moon would be a tennis ball – ¼ the size of earth. This is not arbitrary and is of life-giving importance. Given the basketball and the tennis ball, if we held them up next to one another and asked, “How far away should the tennis ball be in order to be to accurate scale?” Most reply “a few feet.”
Would you believe it’s actually 24 ft?
Which represents 238,000 miles. There is so much distance between the earth and the moon every planet in our solar system could fit in between. But why is that distance so important?
VIDEO LINK
Again, Brian Cox explains the finely-tuned position of our moon in relation to the earth. Watch the video clip here.
Not only does the earth’s gravitational pull have to be precise for our moon not to fly into space or crash into the earth, but the moon’s gravitational pull has to be precise so our earth doesn’t wobble and our tides don’t rise to a height of the Empire State Building.
God chose what was recorded in the Bible on purpose. So, considering the significance of our moon, it’s no surprise that when, in Psalm 8, David is marveling at “the heavens”, he specifically mentions the moon.
“When I consider your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars, which you have set in place,…” – Psalm 8:3
“Knob” No. 3 – Laws in Nature
Ever since Polish astronomer, Nicolas Copernicus, scientists and philosophers have wrestled with the question, “Why are there physical laws at all?” Purely unnatural, blind, unguided processes can’t account for that. Logic dictates that to have physical laws that rule the universe, there must have been a Law-Giver.
Note what the Bible says…
On the laws of nature, Steven Hawking said,…
Citing the precision of the Four Fundamental Law of Physics, Eric Metaxas writes,
“If the ratio between the nuclear strong force and the electromagnetic force had been off by the tiniest fraction of the tiniest fraction—by even one part in 100,000,000,000,000,000—then no stars could have ever formed at all. Feel free to gulp. Multiply that single parameter by all the other necessary conditions, and the odds against the universe existing are so heart-stoppingly astronomical that the notion that it all ‘just happened’ defies common sense. It would be like tossing a coin and having it come up heads 10 quintillion times in a row.”
Neil Degrasse Tyson; Astrophysics for People in a Hurry – Degrasse Tyson then takes these laws a step further:
“This universality of physical laws (of the cosmos) tells us that if we land on another planet with a thriving alien civilization, they will be running on the same laws that we have discovered and tested here on earth…Science thrives not only on the universality of physical laws but also on the existence and persistence of physical constants… If you do the math, you can determine that a star’s luminosity is steeply independent on the universal law of gravity. In other words, if gravity had been slightly different in the past, then the energy output of the sun would have been far more variable than anything the biological, climatological, or geological record indicates. Such is the uniformity of our universe.”
To date, the breadth of our observable universe is 93 billion light years. To transverse our universe, one would have to travel at the speed of light (186,000 miles per second) for 93 billion years. And, according to physicists, the same laws of nature we have here are what we would find anywhere.
Degrasse Tyson used the term “uniformity.” Does universal uniformity arise from blind, unguided processes? I don’t have enough faith to believe it does.
John Lennox is Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University (emeritus).
“Knob” No. 4 – Our Privileged Planet
Have you ever considered our location in our Milky Way Galaxy and why it’s important? Let’s take a look and see if our location matters.
Remember going to the mall and looking at a map to find a store? The first thing you looked for was the little arrow with the statement, “You are here.”
This is our little galactic cul-de-sac.
Milky Way – 105,000 light-years from one side to the other; it’s so big it takes our solar system 220 million years to complete a single orbit.
Scientists programmed the Hubble Telescope to look toward the center of our Milky Way Galaxy and take a photo. Here it is.
Our privileged location in our Galaxy.
Why is our location in our galaxy important – or “privileged”?
Astronomers call our location the Galactic Habitable Zone. Why? Because it is the specific region within a galaxy where life is most likely to develop. Here’s why:
- Low Radiation: The center of the Milky Way packs a supermassive black hole and dense star clusters that blast out deadly X-rays and gamma rays. Earth is far enough away to avoid this constant sterilization
- Stable Orbits: Being too close to massive star clusters would pull Earth out of a stable path around the Sun via gravitational tugs. Our quiet neighborhood prevents chaotic orbital shifts
- Balanced Density: Our location has enough heavy elements to form Earth, but it avoids the extreme overcrowding that triggers constant stellar disruptions.
- The “Sweet Spot” Balance: Too close to the center means too much radiation; too far out means too few heavy elements to build Earth-like worlds.
Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Richards, together holding Ph.D.’s in astronomy, physics, philosophy, and theology. I saw them speak in Dallas at a conference on Science & Faith as they talked about their book ‘The Privileged Planet.”
Our location in the “Galactic Habitable Zone” appears to be anything but arbitrary. It appears to be by design. And design requires a Designer. Blind, unguided chance? I don’t have that much faith.
Our privileged location in our Solar System.
Why is our location in our solar system important – or “privileged”?
Why are we, to borrow the title from a beloved 90’s sitcom, the “3rd rock from the sun” and, say, not the 2nd, 4th, or 5th rock from the sun? Did chance place us where we landed, or was it by design?
Like our universe, our solar system is sustained by gravity so precisely fine-tuned it is beyond comprehension. Remember, the gravitational force of all planets in our solar system must be precisely and inversely related to one another, as well as with the star around which they all orbit, our sun. Without that precision, our planets would wobble out of their orbits and crash into one another, making our solar system uninhabitable. Consider the significance of Jupiter and its relationship to life on our planet.
Jupiter acts sort of like a giant vacuum cleaner. Without a massive planet like Jupiter nearby, whose gravity “sucks up” asteroids, a thousand times as many would hit Earth’s surface.
- Note the asteroid belt between Jupiter & Mars. As we read of meteors crashing into the earth in the book of Revelation, I imagine God removing the gravity required to hold the asteroid belt in place. Just like God removing our perfectly, fine-tuned ozone layer when people are “scorched by the sun.”
A planet that has any hopes of being able to inhabit human life requires precise parameters. Astrophysicist, Hugh Ross, shares,
“322 parameters must characterize a planet if it is to have the capability of supporting [human life]. Every single one of which must be perfectly met, or the whole thing falls apart. The odds against life in the universe are simply astonishing.”
Ross cites just eight parameters:
- the earth’s 23.5 degree tilt,
- the earth’s electromagnetic field,
- earth’s ozone,
- earth’s photosynthetic zone,
- the ration of oceans to land mass,
- the speed of the earth’s rotation,
- the speed at which we orbit the sun,
- our “eccentricity”/slightly elliptical orbit.
These are only 8 parameters. Another 316 (that we know of so far) are required.
In Steven Hawking’s final book, ‘The Grand Design’; Ch 7, The Apparent Miracle. He writes,
“Our solar system has lucky properties without which sophisticated life-forms would have never existed.”
Call it “lucky” if you want. I don’t have that much faith.
Our planet’s position is precarious – yet perfect.
Earth’s “Goldilocks Zone”
This pic was taken by a NASA satellite positioned closer to the sun than Venus. Notice the earth to scale at the top right.
Again, the sun is 93 million miles away, making the light we see from it 8 minutes old. Did you know the sun is not yellow, but blindingly white? Earth’s atmosphere diffracts the sun’s light into the blue sky we all know and love.
Above photo: A solar flare releases a massive burst of total energy (equal to millions of hydrogen bombs) in large flares. This electromagnetic radiation travels at the speed of light and reaches Earth in about eight minutes. Earth is seen to scale at bottom left.
Now you know why your cell phone won’t work during solar flares. They are so insanely powerful and radioactive they knock out our satellites.
The sun should cook us. Yet, we’re placed in the “Goldilocks Zone” – not too hot; not too cold.
Again, Gonzales & Richards from The Privileged Planet:
Earth’s Special “Address”: Why?
We enjoy a “galactic address” perfectly positioned to be able to see and study the handiwork of God. It’s one of the ways he says to us, “I am here.”
God has placed earth at a specific “address” in our “galactic neighborhood”.
Earth’s location in the Orion Arm of the Milky Way galaxy provides a unique observational vantage point, being free from the dense star fields, high radiation, and space debris found in galactic centers or arms, allowing for a clear, unimpeded view of the universe.
Neil deGrasse Tyson frequently discusses how Earth’s unique position and atmospheric conditions are ideal for observation, sometimes describing it as an “amazingly privileged position.”
That the Earth is also perfectly positioned to observe the universe that God created. There are astronomers who are astounded by the fact that the positioning of the earth in the universe around it means that we have a clear view of the universe in order to study it. It is almost as if God intended for us to learn about His creation by virtue of the position where He placed Earth. Earth just happens to be not buried in the midst of a dense cluster of stars. Rather, it is positioned high and free to give us the best position to observe our surroundings.
I read once,
It’s as though God placed us in his universe at the perfect “address” in order to discover him.
Theologians refer to the two revelations of God:
- one they call “special revelation” i.e. He Word/the Bible;
- the other they call “general revelation” i.e. nature – how he gives
- evidence of his existence in everything from stars to quarks.
Paul refers to “general revelation” when he wrote,
As we conclude, let’s take one last look at the size of our universe.
The Andromeda Galaxy is 2.5 ltys away (1.5 quintillion miles). The light we see from Andromeda is 2.5 million years old. You can actually see it with the naked eye.
Fly in a little closer. Andromeda is a full third larger in diameter than our Milky Way.
A little closer (stay with me – there’s a point to our “journey”).
Next photo – as the telescope moves in closer, we begin to see stars. But the pic is still cloudy.
Closer and we begin to recognize the “cloud” as stars.
Now, one last photo with even a deeper, more detailed view of Andromeda…
Andromeda is merely one of trillions of galaxies. Yet, the Bible says,
The Hubble Deep Field
In 2003, the Hubble Space Telescope stared at a tiny region of space in the constellation Fornax for 11.3 days to get this very deep image. They call the image the Hubble Deep Field.
The image required 800 exposures taken over the course of 400 Hubble orbits around Earth. The total amount of exposure time was 11.3 days, taken between Sept. 24, 2003 and Jan. 16, 2004.
They were not prepared for what they saw…
What you see are 10,000 galaxies (not stars, but galaxies) of different sizes and ages. AND this represents 1/24th millionth of the known sky. This would be like holding up a grain of sand to the sky on a starry night.
The Bible says…
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that, over time, what began should begin to break down. Think about a car, or a lawn mower, etc. As the “new” wears off, items such as these get old and wear out. This is called entropy.
But our universe, even at 14 billion years old, continues to be finely tuned to a calibration beyond our comprehension.
R.C. Sproul once commented,
What is holding it all together? Or, Who is holding it all together? The Bible gives us the answer.
Closing Remarks: Chance or Design?
Yale Law School grad and former atheist, Lee Strobel, shares,
“Picture a ruler across the entire known universe, 15 billion light-years long, broken down in one-inch increments. That ruler represents the range along which the force of gravity could have been calibrated. It could have been anywhere along that ruler, but it happens to be at the exact right place so that life can exist. What if we changed it? If we change the force of gravity by just one inch on that “ruler” compared to the 15 billion light-year width of the universe, intelligent life becomes impossible anywhere in the universe. Just with that single change.”
Another favorite example Strobel likes to mention is,
“The ratio between the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force. It must be finely tuned to one part in 10,000 trillion trillion trillion.”
So, what is the best explanation for our universe being the way it is?
What explanation is most rational, reasonable, and logical? Chance or design. Per Occam’s Razor, what is the simplest, most logical conclusion? What makes best sense of reality. What conclusion takes less faith? Let’s, once more, revisit the odds of an explosion we call the Big Bang exploding into unimaginably fine-tuned order with each cosmological constant tuned to a number so precise, to deny design it falls under the category of “absurd.”
Astrophysicist Hugh Ross, offers another mind-blowing example of “chance” being a position that requires a mountain of faith. He says,
“Imagine covering the North American continent in dimes up to the moon—238,000 miles high. But we can’t stop there. For the math to be right, we have to imagine a BILLION North American continents covered in dimes 238,000 miles deep. Now, choose one dime at random, paint it red, and put it somewhere in the piles. Blindfold a friend and have them pick out one dime from the billion continents. What are the odds he’d choose the red dime? One in 10,000 trillion trillion trillion – a number beyond human comprehension.”
I believe this is one reason Abraham Lincoln pondered,
German theoretical physicist, Werner Heisenberg, one of the main pioneers of the theory of quantum mechanics, said,…
Jonathan Feng is Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of California, Irvine. Feng shares,…
Pastor and author, Dustin Benge, offers wonderful biblical truth…
So, if the Beginner/Designer of our Universe existed before time, space, and matter – how do you explain that?
Jewish physicist, Gerald Schroeder, received his PhD in nuclear physics and earth and planetary sciences from MIT. As I watched one of his lectures, here was this orthodox Jew, his white-board filled with advanced mathematics while he’s attempting to offer an explanation for how the universe could have come into existence out of nothing. He turned to look at his students and said,
“What kind of a cause could bring the universe into existence? It must be transcendent because it existed apart from the creation. It must be timeless or eternal because it existed before physical time came into being. It must immaterial or spirit because it existed before the physical world was created. It must be powerful given the immensity of the creation event. It must be caring because he created such as fine-tuned, wonderful habitat for us to exist in. It must be personal because he had to make the decision to create. These attributes perfectly describe the God of the Bible.”
Only a transcendent Force outside of space, time, and matter could, by logic, created something out of nothing. We can’t wrap our minds around that using mere human logic, reason, and intellect. The Bible says,
By faith? Yes. But, as you’ve seen from the scientific data I’ve shard in this blog, it’s not blind faith.
Former atheist, Alister McGrath, is a professor at Oxford and possesses a PhD in Molecular Physics. He concluded,
Robert Jastrow was an American astronomer and planetary physicist. A NASA scientist, he earned his PhD in physics from Columbia University. He once observed,
So let’s conclude with the words of a few theologians.
Finally, Lee Strobel perfectly sums up how the non-theist worldview requires a great deal of faith. Based on the evidence (and it’s overwhelming), the biblical worldview is the best explanation of reality.
A Final Word
Some may be thinking, “This is all good but I’ve never doubted my faith. The evidence for God’s existence is indeed overwhelming but I really don’t need to know about it for my faith in God to remain strong.”
That’s wonderful – for you. But what about others?
Knowing why we believe what we believe is not an option; it’s a command.
Peter, during the reign of the psychopath, Nero, with Christians being tortured and fed to the lions for sport, encouraged his fellow Christians to be prepared to give encouragement to people who were wondering during that tumultuous period, “Where is God? Is he even there?” Peter wrote,
“Always be ready to give a [logical] defense (GR: apologia) to anyone who asks you to account for the hope and confident assurance that is within you, yet [do this] with gentleness and respect.” (1 Peter 3:15)
When we can’t offer a reasoned, logical explanation for why we believe what we believe, or when we are unable to help someone with the hard questions about the Christian faith, we become, as one author put it,…
…”just one more reason for a non-believer to dismiss the Christian faith i.e. ‘If a Christian doesn’t believe their faith important enough to give a logical explanation for why they believe it, why should I consider their faith important.'”
Nick Watts



























































